Cryptographic readiness
Discovery, prioritization, and a crypto-agile plan of record.
Cryptographic exposure discovery and PQC readiness mapping inventories cryptographic use across applications, certificates, protocols, keys, archives, and integrations. It classifies exposure, prioritizes response, and prepares a phased migration.
Requires validationNot an already deployed universal post-quantum encryption layer.
Cryptographic Exposure Explorer
S1
Discover
S2
Inventory
S3
Classify exposure
S4
Prioritize
S5
Plan migration
S6
Validate
Current posture
Readiness assessment
Migration planning
Approved implementation
Cryptographic exposure discovery and PQC readiness mapping is a readiness capability, not a claim of completed migration.
What it does
Inventory, classify exposure, prioritize, plan migration, and validate.
What it does not do
Automatically migrate every system, or imply completed post-quantum deployment.
Where it fits
Long-retention archives, certificates, key material, and protocol endpoints.
Who decides
Beneficiary approves migration plans and algorithm changes.
Included capabilities
What a credible PQC readiness posture looks like
- Post-quantum readiness assessment. Environment-by-environment mapping of exposure and migration readiness.
- Automated crypto discovery. Inventory of algorithms, protocols, certificates, and key material in use.
- Policy-based migration planning. Phased sequencing driven by data sensitivity and retention horizon.
- Certificate and key lifecycle governance. Issuance, rotation, and revocation aligned to migration priorities.
- Hybrid deployment support. Coexistence of classical and post-quantum algorithms during transition.
- Rollback and exception handling. Governed reversal paths where a change proves unsafe or premature.
- Audit trail generation. Signed records of algorithm changes, key rotations, and phase checkpoints.
- Risk scoring. Prioritization by data sensitivity, retention horizon, and jurisdictional exposure.
- Board-ready reporting. Human-readable summaries suited to funders and non-technical stakeholders.
Nonprofit and mission-driven constraints
Designed for the operating reality
- · Limited budget and small IT teams
- · Donor-data sensitivity and grant-assurance obligations
- · Volunteer and administrator turnover
- · Deep cloud and SaaS dependence
- · Legacy systems that cannot be easily replaced
- · Grant and compliance reporting needs
The service emphasizes low operational burden, managed onboarding, fixed-scope packages, human-readable risk summaries, and evidence-first implementation.
Claims we do not make
- · Full protocol-level PQC implementation across all beneficiary systems
- · Drop-in replacement for existing TLS or PKI stacks
- · Guaranteed quantum resistance across every dependency
- · Certification for regulated deployments without validation
- · Security across integrations without integration testing